"Education" Amendment Bill - yeah right...

Colleague Denise Torrey is the new and very well respected president of the New Zealand Principals Federation. In her weekly editorial to members this week, she highlights the very disconcerting Education Amendment Bill passed last week in parliament; describing the bill as making "for a black week in Education". She went on to write:

"Initially, NZPF welcomed the promise of a shift towards independence and ownership of the Teachers’ Council by the profession and applauded its focus on raising the status of the profession. These were ideas the Minister publicised when talking about the changes early on. As it turned out, the amendments are anything but confidence boosting and certainly won’t raise any optimism for the profession.

In our own submission on the Bill, we addressed a number of issues including the name ‘EDUCANZ’. Our alternative suggestion was TCANZ – Teachers’ Council of Aotearoa NZ. In our view teachers are unlikely to feel ownership of a professional body intended for and funded by them which doesn’t have the word ‘teacher’ in it.

We also drew attention to the language used in the bill pointing out the way in which the word ‘educator’ and ‘teacher’ were used to mean the same thing when they are patently not.

Finally we drew attention to the process for appointing the members of the governing board which involved the Minister choosing them all. This is hardly a process to make teachers feel they have autonomy in relation to their own professional body.

We also opposed the changes to accommodate charter schools because ‘charter school [workers] will work in exactly the same contexts as trained teachers, but will have no legislated requirement to be registered, and the list of critical functions from which they are exempt must be seen first as a concern, and then as a contradiction of the stated goals of the new body’.

There were in excess of 1000 submissions. Most, like NZPF, opposed aspects of the Bill. We placed our trust in the select committee process and believed that if enough people opposed certain bits of the Bill, they would be changed.  But not so. The Select Committee vote was an even split, so status quo rules and all of the objectionable parts of the Bill remain.

Cynics had myriad Tui billboards in mind long ago. Given last week’s outcome, perhaps we all should have. Rather than empowering the profession, this legislation has done the opposite. It is about controlling us. That’s what is so disappointing.

NZPF believed that there were areas for improvement and looked forward to seeing the Teachers’ Council strengthened, as was already happening. We envisaged ERO as the natural auditor for appraisal and looked forward to better pre-service selection, co-ordinated, suitably funded, quality PLD and professional development programmes for principals.

Your national executive will meet this weekend and consider how we might respond to this new legislation. We have had discussions with both NZEI and PPTA and will continue with those discussions.   We will keep you updated on any progress."

Denise is right. It is about disempowering and controlling the teaching profession. The only step left to take is to totally silence the profession; "Und zey haff vays of doing zat too, mein liddle Liebchen..."

Resolution re-vision...

How do you spell intelligence?

I've never been one for New Year's resolutions but it was obvious that this year required that rule to be broken....just this once: "I resolve to keep my blog up to date; make at least two entries per term." 

So: "Dear Diary..." yeah, nah...that's just not gonna cut it!

Having had a decent "stay-cation" (never went anywhere but got a decent Southland tan anyway - albeit singlet shaped): work beckoned. So, today we kicked off two days of professional development with the teaching staff.

The troops followed up their compulsory professional reading programme by comparing the facets of a "fixed mind set" with those of a "growth mindset". 

The flow-on activity involved the staff being divided into teams to sort and sift their discoveries before going head to head in a little problem-solving action.  

A good team looking sharp: with Justine, Pauline, Cynthia, Carolyn (praying for victory - at this stage, the rest of us didn't even know there was a contest!);
and Dale (wondering whether or not she's had breakfast).

The growth mindset is one we want to cultivate in our kids (and in our staff too); we'll provide more links and information on this a the year progresses.

Mean time: how much does 'effort' count? Way more than you might think. A very good example of the growth impact of an 'effort' mindset, makes this five-minute clip well worth watching. 

No point rewriting something I completely agree with (source NZEI):

Important information about teachers’ vote this week rejecting the “Investing in Educational Success” policy


Dear Parents and Caregivers

You may have heard in the media this week that New Zealand’s teachers and principals have
voted to reject the government’s Investing in Educational Success policy.
I wanted to write to you to explain the reasons behind the decision and what this may mean
for our school.
What is Investing in Educational Success?
In January the government announced this new policy, aimed at raising the quality of
teaching to improve student achievement, backed by $359 million of new funding over four
years.
The policy proposed that all primary and secondary schools would be grouped into clusters
of about 10 schools, with each cluster led by an Executive Principal from one of the schools,
who would be paid an extra $40,000 a year and work two days a week across the cluster.
About 1000 Expert Teachers would receive an extra $20,000 a year and spend two days a
week out of their own classroom while they mentored other teachers across the cluster.
About 5000 Lead Teachers would be role models to teachers within their cluster.
Why are teachers and principals opposed to it?
Like their colleagues around the country, teachers at our school could see no direct benefit
for our students from this policy. Teachers have a number of concerns, but the key issues
are:

1) Teachers want the money to go to much-needed frontline resources for students,
not into another tier of management.
2) The relationship and continuity of learning between primary students and their
teachers is very important for effective learning. Taking an Expert Teacher out of
their classroom for 40 per cent of the time, to be replaced by relievers, could have a
negative effect on students’ learning.

Consider this...

Read this through this list

http://saveourschoolsnz.wordpress.com/2014/03/17/the-list-what-national-has-done-to-new-zealand-education/

Now ask yourself:
"Have our kids really benefitted from this?"
"What's the real agenda?"
"Is this designed to turn out an educated / innovative workforce - or simply a compliant / conformist one?"
"Who cares - they're only kids right?"

NZ schooling is about to die - here's what's been going on to make that happen....

Here's the truth:

http://saveourschoolsnz.wordpress.com/2014/04/06/join-the-dots-what-government-is-doing-to-nz-education/

http://networkonnet.wordpress.com/2014/04/06/ernie-buutveld-delivers-when-a-person-of-ernies-stature-does-this-we-should-all-listen-intently/

Excellent summary!

http://saveourschoolsnz.wordpress.com/2013/05/06/charter-schools-the-winners-and-losers/

So many people saying it better than I ever could

So straight to the links:

http://localbodies-bsprout.blogspot.co.nz/2014/03/the-destruction-of-new-zealands-public.html

http://publicaddress.net/busytown/school-bully/

http://publicaddress.net/busytown/testing-1-2-3/